Conceptual 240-assembly core heat map
Radial power shape and aggregate rod suppression. Geometry is deliberately schematic; no artificial assembly oscillation is imposed.
Drawing No. EH–NR–013 // Nuclear Engineering & Radiation
Reviewed August 2026
Operate a visual, coupled model of a passive 300 MWe-class boiling water small modular reactor (SMR), using the BWRX-300 as the public reference design. Bring the unit from shutdown to criticality, heat up the reactor, roll and synchronize the turbine, manage water level and pressure, test passive safety systems, and respond to abnormal events.
Steam is condensed in three passive trains and returned to the vessel by gravity; pool inventory indicates remaining passive heat-removal endurance.
Electrical endurance for UPS-backed monitoring, I&C, alarms and essential safety-category loads. Passive cooling-water endurance is shown separately by the ICS pool inventory above.
The additional views connect operator actions to core behaviour. They are conceptual educational displays, not a replica of a proprietary control-room interface or licensed core-monitoring system.
Radial power shape and aggregate rod suppression. Geometry is deliberately schematic; no artificial assembly oscillation is imposed.
BWRX-300 has no recirculation pumps; public GDA information describes a single natural-circulation power/flow line.
Core excess reactivity is shown separately from the always-negative control-rod worth. Withdrawal removes negative rod worth; it does not make the absorber itself a positive-reactivity source.
Shows total reactor heat as the sum of the fission-chain component and radioactive decay heat, together with the heat-removal paths represented by the model. ICS capacity is reported separately; modelled ICS duty can temporarily exceed decay heat while stored RPV thermal energy is being removed during cooldown.
The model is intentionally more rigorous than a simple animation, but it remains a reduced-order classroom model. It cannot reproduce vendor safety analysis, licensed operating procedures, core-follow calculations, protection setpoints or plant-specific commissioning data.
The BWRX-300 is a direct-cycle light-water boiling water reactor. Water boils in the reactor pressure vessel, steam passes directly to the turbine, exhaust steam is condensed, and condensate is pumped back as feedwater. The tall reactor vessel and chimney create buoyancy head for natural circulation, eliminating normal recirculation pumps and their external vessel loops.
The model represents the reactor pressure vessel, 240-assembly core, 57 cruciform control rods driven by fine-motion control rod drives (FMCRDs), steam separators and dryer, main steam isolation, turbine control and bypass valves, turbine-generator, condenser, feedwater pumps, reactor level and pressure controls, three isolation-condenser trains, the Passive Containment Cooling System (PCCS) at a highly simplified level, and boron injection.
Reactor power is evolved with a six delayed-neutron-group point-kinetics model. The precursor groups use representative educational U-235 delayed-neutron fractions and decay constants. Reactivity is the sum of calibrated core excess reactivity, negative control-rod absorber worth, Doppler feedback, moderator/void feedback, xenon poisoning, boron injection and automatic power-control bias. Rod withdrawal removes negative absorber worth; it is not displayed as positive rod reactivity.
dn/dt = [(ρ − β)/Λ]n + Σ λᵢCᵢ + S ; dCᵢ/dt = (βᵢ/Λ)n − λᵢCᵢThe prompt generation time, feedback coefficients and aggregate rod-worth curve are calibrated educational values. They are selected for numerically stable, qualitatively realistic response across shutdown, startup and power operation; they are not BWRX-300 safety-analysis constants.
Radioactive decay heat is represented by a separate multi-time-scale fission-product inventory driven by operating chain power. The equilibrium groups sum to about 6.5% of rated heat immediately after a long full-power run and retain a long tail through hours and days; the fit is generic and educational rather than a core-specific ANS-5.1 calculation.
The public Boron Injection System (BIS) is a diverse emergency reactivity-control path intended to make the reactor subcritical from full power down to a cold 20 °C condition without relying on control-rod motion. The current General Description states that BIS can be initiated manually or automatically; the simulator exposes only a manual Boron inject action and compresses the system to a lumped buildup of negative reactivity. It does not model boron concentration, mixing, injection-pump hydraulics, automatic initiation parameters or real plant actuation timing.
The reactor thermal-hydraulic model uses lumped fuel and coolant energy balances. Natural-circulation flow increases with core power and density difference across the core/chimney path. Steam generation follows the heat transferred above the saturation threshold, while separator inventory and steam discharge determine vessel pressure and indicated level.
ṁNC ∝ √(Δρ · g · H / K) ; dU/dt = Qfuel→coolant − Qsteam − QICS − QotherAt rated conditions, model steam flow is calibrated to approximately 430 kg/s from an 870 MWth direct-cycle heat balance using representative BWR steam/feedwater enthalpies. A public rated main-steam mass-flow value was not identified in the audited BWRX-300 sources, so 430 kg/s is treated explicitly as a model estimate. It should not be confused with the public nominal reactor-coolant circulation value of 1827 kg/s.
Reactor level is driven by mass inventory, feedwater inflow, steam outflow and a simplified void-related shrink/swell term. Public PSR Chapter 7 states that below 10% reactor power the level-control system uses a low-flow control valve, while above roughly 10–15% it controls adjustable-speed feedwater-pump drives. Chapter 10 adds that the fuller multi-element heat-balance demand logic—using level, steam flow, reactor pressure and feedwater temperature—is typically applied above about 25% power; at lower power with the low-flow valve, control is based on level only. The simulator smooths these transitions instead of reproducing vendor control logic exactly.
The feedwater temperature model is also dynamic rather than an instantaneous load correlation. It represents stored heat in the LP/HP heater train, turbine extraction-steam heating and the public CFS control concept in which the C31 system modulates steam flow to Feedwater Heater #6 to control final feedwater temperature. During a feedwater line break, pump/header flow is separated from flow actually reaching the RPV; the RPV inlet temperature trace is discontinued after feedwater reactor isolation because no inlet stream then exists.
Opening steam valves or increasing steam demand briefly increases voiding and indicated level (swell); reducing steam demand collapses voids and can temporarily lower indicated level (shrink). The effect is deliberately restrained to preserve stability in a browser-based educational model.
When the generator is off-line, reactor pressure is controlled primarily by the turbine bypass valves discharging to the condenser. When the generator is on-line, the turbine control valves regulate steam flow and reactor pressure while the load controller sets electrical output. Public PSR Chapter 10 specifies turbine-bypass steam-flow capacity of no less than 25% of rated steam flow and states that the bypass/reactor combination can accommodate a 25% load rejection without reactor SCRAM. The reduced-order simulator conservatively fixes its simplified maximum bypass capacity at exactly 25%; this should not be read as a published BWRX-300 maximum.
The turbine can be rolled only with adequate steam pressure, available condenser vacuum and open steam isolation valves. The public General Description characterises a typical BWRX-300 turbine as a 3000/3600 rpm, single-shaft, tandem-compound, impulse-reaction, two-stage-reheat condensing turbine, coupled to a direct-driven three-phase 50/60 Hz synchronous generator. The simulator represents those public functional characteristics and does not assume a proprietary turbine model designation. Closing the breaker then allows electrical loading. On turbine trip, the TCV/TSV path closes rapidly while the TBVs initially open and then modulate, so full-load rejection produces an initial reactor-pressure rise before SCRAM and subsequent cooldown.
The simulator includes automatic trip logic for high power, short reactor period during startup, high/low vessel pressure, low or high level, high containment pressure, high condenser pressure, turbine-trip demand, main-steam isolation, low electrical bus voltage, sustained low feedwater flow and validated line-break indications. The public BWRX-300 I&C architecture uses both parameter trips and anticipatory event/status signals through the Automatic Protection System (APS) and associated protection functions. Most numerical thresholds and qualification times in this trainer are calibrated educational values rather than plant setpoints. Two public Step 2 protection values are used directly where the pressure datum is unambiguous: the generic high-RPV-pressure SCRAM fallback is 7.787 MPa(g), approximately 7.89 MPa(a), and the high-containment-pressure protection reference is 18.5 kPa(g). The simulator uses MSIV as compact operator-interface shorthand; public BWRX-300 documentation distinguishes Main Steam Reactor Isolation Valves (MSRIVs) at the reactor pressure boundary from Main Steam Containment Isolation Valves (MSCIVs) farther out on each main-steam line. For generic post-SCRAM pressure escalation, the three ICS trains are staged at the public HP2/HP3/HP4 pressure thresholds rather than at invented lower pressures.
Failure scenarios no longer command an automatic SCRAM merely because a scenario button was pressed. The initiating event first changes equipment or process conditions, the relevant monitored signal must develop and persist for a finite qualification time, and only then is the protection action generated. On a normal SCRAM, stored accumulator energy in the hydraulic control units rapidly inserts the control rods hydraulically. Public I&C documentation also describes a simultaneous FMCRD “scram follow” signal whenever APS demands hydraulic SCRAM: the motor drives the ball nut upward to just below the inserted and latched piston. That follow motion is distinct from the diverse electric motor-driven rod run-in function, which can shut the reactor down if hydraulic SCRAM fails or is delayed. The trainer collapses these mechanisms into one rod-insertion state rather than resolving them separately. Fission power collapses, but decay heat remains.
The public UK GDA describes three independent isolation-condenser trains. Each heat exchanger is submerged in a dedicated inner pool and linked to outer pool inventory. Steam flows from the reactor to the condenser, condenses, and returns by gravity. In the trainer an automatic ICS actuation is latched until reset; actual heat-transfer duty then falls naturally as vessel pressure and temperature decrease rather than by artificial rapid valve cycling.
Public PSR Chapter 6 specifies three independent ICS trains, each rated at 33.75 MW(th). For safety-analysis credit, one train can generally mitigate AOOs, two trains are required for LOCA mitigation with one of the three assumed unavailable by single failure, and all three trains are credited for beyond-design-basis events. The same chapter states that the smallest inner-pool inventory combined with outer-pool inventory provides at least three days of decay-heat removal, while the two-smallest inner-pool inventories combined with the outer pool support at least seven days; the outer-pool arrangement is also described as retaining a minimum seven-day capability with one ICS train unavailable. ONR separately reports a conservative 72-hour one-train endurance calculation leaving about 50.6% of the smaller Pool A volume and a seven-day extended calculation leaving about 7.3% in the larger Pools B/C. The trainer compresses these public capacity/endurance anchors into one aggregate pool meter. Generic pressure-driven actuation now uses the three public Step 2 high-pressure thresholds—8.289, 8.504 and 8.719 MPa(g), corresponding to approximately 8.390, 8.605 and 8.820 MPa(a) in the trainer's pressure basis. Public I&C also lists low RPV water level, high containment pressure and qualified line-break indications as ICS actuation signals. Because the audited public material does not disclose the numerical L2 water-level setpoint, the trainer's generic deep-low-level mapping remains explicitly educational; the dedicated DBA scenario branches reproduce their published signal sequence separately. The aggregate pool indication is not an individual BWRX-300 pool-level, boil-off, makeup-water or licensing-credit calculation.
The Passive Containment Cooling System (PCCS) is a separate passive containment heat-removal function. The current public design describes three passive PCCS trains that are continuously available/in service and become effective as accident steam and heat load the containment. The trainer represents PCCS only as a lumped containment heat sink and availability indication; it does not model PCCS loop natural circulation, pool boil-off, condensation surfaces, containment heat structures or individual-train performance.
The guided sequence is a teaching workflow assembled from public descriptions of BWR controls and the BWRX-300 plant automation functions: establish systems, select STARTUP mode, approach criticality under wide-range neutron monitoring, heat and pressurize through bypass control, establish feedwater level control, roll and synchronize the turbine, close the breaker, transfer to RUN mode, and raise load.
For normal STARTUP/SHUTDOWN only, the trainer limits bulk-coolant heat-up/cooldown to about 55.6 °C/h (100 °F/h) as a generic BWR vessel thermal-stress teaching constraint. This is not a published BWRX-300 operating limit and it is not imposed on accident or passive-safety cooldown transients.
It is not an operating procedure and omits required verifications, surveillance, chemistry controls, radiation protection controls, technical specifications, staffing and hold points. Actual plant startup would be performed only by licensed personnel using approved plant-specific procedures.
Turbine trip / load rejection: trips the turbine first; an APS turbine-trip demand is then qualified before SCRAM, and the normal bypass path limits the initial pressure rise. The trainer does not initiate ICS for this AOO unless a separate ICS actuation signal is actually reached. Loss of feedwater: trips all feedwater pumps while the bounding pressure-control assumption is held failed-as-is; RPV inventory and pressure fall, low water level initiates SCRAM, low RPV pressure later isolates main steam, and a lower-level condition starts all three ICS trains. Loss of condenser vacuum: progressively raises condenser backpressure; turbine trip/SCRAM occurs first, the bypass initially controls pressure, and continued vacuum degradation can inhibit/close the bypass so pressure later rises toward one-train ICS high-pressure actuation. Station blackout: removes normal AC support first; low-bus-voltage protection then initiates the reactor trip while passive systems remain available, with generic ICS actuation following the public high-pressure sequence rather than an artificial immediate start.
Small LOCA + LOPP: follows the public bounding small-break sequence: feedwater coasts down, pressure control is unavailable, the RPV depressurizes, SCRAM follows qualified low steam/RPV pressure, main-steam isolation follows later, and ICS starts on low level. Main steam line isolation: allows finite valve travel before APS closure logic trips the reactor. Inadvertent rod withdrawal: demonstrates the public Automatic Thermal Limits Monitor (ATLM) / Multi-Channel Rod Block Monitor (MRBM) rod-block concept; abnormal withdrawal stops before a large power excursion unless that protection were separately assumed failed. ICS train failure: latches one passive heat-removal train unavailable without causing SCRAM; it may be combined with one initiating event, and automatic logic selects the remaining available trains. Feedwater line break: uses a bounding large-break + LOPP training sequence: blowdown and pump coastdown begin at time zero, SCRAM follows validated break indication, and feedwater/main-steam isolation valves close over several seconds rather than instantaneously. Heat-sink degradation: raises condenser pressure gradually until a protection threshold is exceeded.
Each important input is classified so that public design facts are not confused with engineering estimates used to make the interactive model behave coherently.
PUBLIC = directly traceable to the current public BWRX-300 source set; CALIBRATED = simulator value fitted or selected for coherent reduced-order behaviour; ASSUMED = generic educational constraint not claimed as BWRX-300 design data.
| Model item | Value / implementation | Status and basis |
|---|---|---|
| Rated reactor thermal power | 870 MWth | PUBLIC General Description Revision J key-feature table; consistent with the consolidated UK GDA PSR. |
| Electrical output | ~316 MWe gross; ~300 MWe net-to-grid reference | PUBLIC General Description Revision J gives ~316 MWe gross in the key-feature table and ~300 MWe net to grid in the reference-site parameter table, with 10–30 MWe in-house consumption. |
| Primary circulation | Natural circulation, no recirculation pumps | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapter 4 describes density-driven natural circulation and a single-line core power/flow map with no active core-flow control at a given power. |
| Core and control system | 240 GNF2 assemblies; 57 cruciform control rods / FMCRDs | PUBLIC General Description Revision J and UK GDA PSR Chapter 4. FMCRD is the drive mechanism; it is not the control blade itself. The PSR states that each HCU normally serves two FMCRDs except the centre rod, but this table avoids presenting a derived HCU count as an explicitly published plant value. |
| Mode switch | REFUEL / SHUTDOWN / STARTUP / RUN | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapter 7. |
| RPV reference geometry | ~4 m inside diameter; ~27 m inside height | PUBLIC General Description Revision J key-feature table. |
| RCPB design pressure | 10.342 MPa(g) | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapter 5. The simulator's absolute-pressure design limit is the corresponding ~10.44 MPa(a). |
| Plant design life | 60 years | PUBLIC General Description Revision J and ONR Step-2 design summary. |
| Turbine / generator public basis | 3000/3600 rpm turbine; direct-driven 50/60 Hz synchronous generator | PUBLIC General Description Revision J. No proprietary turbine model designation is assumed by the simulator. |
| Isolation condenser system | 3 independent trains; 33.75 MW(th) each; public pool inventory supports ≥3 d on the smallest-pool basis and ≥7 d on the two-pool / outer-pool basis | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapter 6 and ONR Step-2 mechanical assessment. ONR also reports 50.6% of smaller Pool A remaining after a conservative 72 h one-train duty and 7.3% in larger Pools B/C after seven-day extended duty. The simulator's aggregate meter is a calibrated educational abstraction, not plant pool accounting. |
| Passive Containment Cooling System | 3 passive trains; continuously available / in service | PUBLIC General Description Revision J and UK GDA PSR Chapter 6. CALIBRATED The trainer reduces PCCS to a lumped containment heat-removal effect and does not model individual loops, pool inventory or detailed condensation heat transfer. |
| Safety Class 1 battery / DC endurance | At least 72 h for credited battery-supported functions | PUBLIC General Description Revision J states that SC1 batteries provide at least 72 h backup capacity and that battery power supports required monitoring for at least 72 h. The displayed value is an aggregate trainer indicator, not a load-by-load battery sizing calculation. |
| Turbine bypass capability | ≥25% of rated steam flow; 25% load rejection without reactor SCRAM | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapter 10. The simulator uses exactly 25% as a conservative simplified cap; the public source does not state that 25% is the plant's maximum bypass capacity. |
| Feedwater level-control transition | <10%: low-flow valve; >10–15%: feedwater-pump ASD; typically >25%: multi-element heat-balance demand | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapters 7 and 10. The simulator smooths these public control-region transitions rather than reproducing the proprietary control implementation. |
| Rated operating pressure | 7.2 MPa(a) key-feature value; 7.17 MPa(a) nominal reference-site value | PUBLIC General Description Revision J. The simulator uses the rounded 7.2 MPa(a) value. |
| Nominal reactor-coolant circulation | 1827 kg/s | PUBLIC General Description Revision J reference-site parameter table. This is natural-circulation coolant flow through the reactor system, not main-steam flow. |
| Reference-site reactor coolant temperatures | ~270 °C core inlet; ~288 °C core outlet | PUBLIC General Description Revision J reference-site parameter table. The trainer has a single lumped bulk-coolant temperature state and therefore does not separately reproduce inlet and outlet temperatures. |
| Condenser reference pressure used by trainer | 8.0 kPa(a) at nominal conditions | CALIBRATED Representative educational condenser-vacuum reference used to make turbine/condenser controls behave coherently. It is not presented as a published BWRX-300 condenser design value. |
| FMCRD rod-driven power-maneuver limits | 50–90%: ≤0.5% rated power/min; 90–100%: ≤2%/min | PUBLIC General Description Revision J, FMCRD speed limitations. These are rod-drive power-maneuver limits, not a statement that routine daily load following uses the 2%/min band. |
| Daily load-following capability | 50–100% daily at ~0.5% rated power/min down and back up | PUBLIC General Description Revision J, Section 16.1 and the reference-site parameter table. |
| Rated main steam flow used by model | ~430 kg/s | CALIBRATED Energy-balance estimate from 870 MWth and representative BWR steam/feedwater enthalpies. A public rated main-steam mass-flow value was not identified in the audited sources. |
| High-pressure SCRAM fallback | 7.89 MPa(a), equivalent to ~7.787 MPa(g) | PUBLIC UK GDA Step-2 mechanical-engineering assessment. This public threshold is used for the generic high-pressure fallback. |
| ICS high-pressure actuation setpoints | 8.289 / 8.504 / 8.719 MPa(g) ≈ 8.390 / 8.605 / 8.820 MPa(a) | PUBLIC UK GDA Step-2 mechanical assessment and deterministic-safety-analysis data. The trainer now uses these three values directly for generic pressure-driven train staging. Its numerical mapping of the public low-level [L2] actuation signal remains CALIBRATED because the L2 setpoint itself was not identified in the audited public documents. |
| Published AOO pressure benchmarks | ~7.55 MPa(a): load rejection/turbine trip and loss of condenser vacuum; ~7.47 MPa(a): closure of one MSRIV | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapter 15.9. These are safety-analysis result summaries, not simulator setpoints. The aggregate main-steam-isolation training scenario is not a one-to-one reproduction of the single-MSRIV event. |
| Primary containment pressure basis | Normal: 1.72–9.0 kPa(g); design internal pressure: 413.7 kPa(g); high-containment protection reference: 18.5 kPa(g) | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapters 6 and 15.5. The trainer uses 5 kPa(g) as a representative nominal RUN indication and the public 18.5 kPa(g) high-containment protection reference. |
| Published containment accident-pressure benchmarks | 407 kPa(a) feedwater-pipe break ≈305.7 kPa(g); 423 kPa(a) main-steam-pipe break ≈321.7 kPa(g); 191 kPa(a) small steam/liquid breaks ≈89.7 kPa(g) | PUBLIC UK GDA PSR Chapters 15.5/15.9 and ONR Step-2 mechanical assessment. Chapter 15.5 explicitly gives the 423 kPa main-steam-break result as approximately 322 kPa(g), establishing the pressure datum used by the summary table. The trainer calibrates its gauge-pressure containment state to the ~305.7 kPa(g) feedwater-break and ~89.7 kPa(g) small-break equivalents, not to the absolute numbers. |
| ONR sampled containment operational pressure limit | 463.5 kPa (ONR quoted value) | PUBLIC ONR Step-2 mechanical-engineering assessment. ONR quotes 463.5 kPa without appending a pressure datum in that sentence. The associated Chapter 15 accident peaks are reported on an absolute-pressure basis, so applying the same convention would correspond to about 362.2 kPa(g); that conversion is an interpretation, not an independently quoted ONR gauge value. This is distinct from the PSR's 413.7 kPa(g) containment design internal pressure and is not used as a trainer trip setpoint. |
| Other trip and isolation thresholds | Educational values shown through alarms | CALIBRATED Functional logic follows public system descriptions; values are educational except where this table explicitly identifies a public threshold (for example high RPV pressure and high containment pressure). |
| Point kinetics and feedback coefficients | 6-group U-235 educational data with lumped thermal feedback | CALIBRATED Standard kinetics structure; not vendor core physics. |
| Boron Injection System representation | Manual trainer command; lumped negative-reactivity buildup | PUBLIC Function: diverse emergency reactivity control capable of full-power-to-cold-subcritical shutdown without control-rod motion; current General Description describes both manual and automatic initiation. CALIBRATED Trainer implementation: no concentration, mixing, pump-flow, automatic-initiation or plant timing model. |
| Decay heat | 13-group reduced-order inventory; ~6.5% at shutdown, ~6.2% at 1 s, ~3.6% at 1 min, ~1.3% at 1 h, ~0.6% at 8 h, ~0.4% at 1 day, ~0.2% at 1 week, ~0.1% at 1 month | CALIBRATED Generic educational fit chosen to reproduce representative LWR decay-heat magnitude and long-tail behaviour at selected times. These percentages are model calibration anchors, not published BWRX-300 data and not an ANS-5.1 calculation. |
| Normal startup / shutdown bulk-coolant ramp limiter | 55.6 °C/h (100 °F/h) | ASSUMED Generic BWR thermal-stress teaching constraint used only by the trainer. It is explicitly not presented as a published BWRX-300 operating limit. |
The current build is regression-tested from stable shutdown, 50/60 Hz guided startup, a 24-hour nominal RUN state, normal load-following ramps, manual protection/control actions, and all ten initiating-event scenarios. The transient audit uses the same 0.25 s internal integration increment used by normal Run mode; the +1 s button executes four internal substeps so results do not depend materially on which control advances time. At nominal conditions the reduced-order model holds approximately 100% power, 7.20 MPa(a), rated steam/feedwater flow and 316 MWe without an unintended trip. Full-power AOO-style pressure transients are checked against public Chapter 15.9 summaries only where the initiating-event definition is sufficiently comparable; the loss-of-feedwater case is also checked against the detailed public Chapter 15.5 depressurisation / isolation / ICS sequence. The two modelled inside-containment break cases are scaled against the gauge-pressure equivalents of the public conservative absolute containment-pressure results. These are regression/calibration anchors for a reduced-order trainer, not independent predictions or safety-analysis validation.
Scope note: matching one published peak does not make this a validated safety-analysis code. The regression tests are intended to catch sign errors, impossible energy/mass behaviour, bad state transitions and scenario logic regressions.
Source hierarchy used on this page. Current plant-description values are taken preferentially from the June 2026 General Description Revision J. The consolidated UK GDA Step-2 PSR Revision B and ONR Step-2 assessment reports remain the principal public sources for protection architecture, deterministic transient sequences and safety-analysis results. Those source sets serve different purposes and dates, so the page does not silently force them into a single design baseline where wording or pressure datum differs. Regulatory/project pages below provide status and context; the commercial product page is retained only for general context and is not used as a numerical validation source. Where public documents provide a range, minimum capability or approximate value, the table preserves that qualification rather than silently converting it into an exact plant setpoint.
GE Vernova Hitachi — BWRX-300 General Description, Revision J (June 2026) — principal current public source for plant overview, rated outputs, geometry, fuel/control system, turbine-generator characteristics, load following and reference-site parameters.
GE Vernova Hitachi — BWRX-300 UK GDA document library — master entry point for the consolidated Step-2 PSR and Preliminary Environmental Report.
PSR Chapter 1 — Introduction — Step-2 PSR scope, general plant description and principal characteristics used for high-level design traceability.
PSR Chapter 4 — Reactor — core/fuel, control rods and FMCRDs, natural-circulation power/flow behaviour, reactivity and stability discussion.
PSR Chapter 5 — Reactor Coolant System and Associated Systems — RPV/NBS design, pressure boundary and design pressure.
PSR Chapter 6 — Engineered Safety Features — ICS trains and safety-analysis credit, 33.75 MW(th) per-train capacity, pool arrangement/endurance, Boron Injection System emergency reactivity control, containment and passive safety functions.
PSR Chapter 7 — Instrumentation and Control — reactor mode switch, level/feedwater control transition, feedwater-temperature control, pressure control, rod control, hydraulic SCRAM / FMCRD scram-follow logic and protection functions.
PSR Chapter 10 — Steam and Power Conversion — turbine/condenser/feedwater systems and turbine-bypass capability.
PSR Chapter 15.2 — Identification, Categorisation and Grouping of PIEs and Accident Scenarios — initiating-event grouping and selection of bounding events.
PSR Chapter 15.5 — Deterministic Safety Analyses — detailed public transient sequences and figures, including loss-of-feedwater and break analyses; it also resolves the containment-pressure datum used by the Chapter 15.9 summary (for example, 423 kPa absolute is stated as approximately 322 kPa(g)). This is a large PDF and may load slowly in some browsers.
PSR Chapter 15.9 — Summary of Results of the Safety Analyses — published AOO/DBA result summaries used as selected regression benchmarks.
UK Office for Nuclear Regulation — BWRX-300 Step 2 Mechanical Engineering Assessment — independent regulatory assessment used here for the public high-pressure SCRAM value, ICS heat-removal/endurance evidence and qualification caveats.
UK Office for Nuclear Regulation — current BWRX-300 GDA status — records completion of the BWRX-300 reactor-design assessment at Step 2 in December 2025 and links the current Step-2 publications.
UK Office for Nuclear Regulation — BWRX-300 GDA Step 2 Statement (11 December 2025) — states that the requesting party chose to stop GDA at the end of Step 2, with future regulatory assessment assumed to be site-specific; a Design Assessment Confirmation (DAC) would require returning to complete Step 3.
U.S. NRC — BWRX-300 activities and licensing topical reports — regulatory background and approved/submitted methodology reports; not the primary source for the simulator's numerical plant values.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission — Darlington New Nuclear Project — current Canadian project/licensing status. CNSC lists one BWRX-300 unit under construction; the first construction regulatory hold point was lifted in March 2026, and OPG submitted an operating-licence application in March 2026.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission — historical BWRX-300 Vendor Design Review executive summary (2023) — useful regulatory background, but explicitly a pre-licensing review and not a current design-value source.
GE Vernova Hitachi — BWRX-300 product overview — current commercial/project context only.
Include the inputs and assumptions used.