Skip to content

Drawing No. EH–FM–027 // Fluid Mechanics & Piping

Vacuum Pump-Down Simulator & Economics Tool

Reviewed August 2026

Estimate how long a vacuum chamber takes to reach its target pressure, check the attainable pressure floor, and compare the annual cost and payback of a faster pump.

Scope: Constant effective pumping speed, constant gas load and isothermal ideal-gas behaviour. Use pump speed at the chamber, or apply the line-efficiency factor to account for valves, filters and piping.

What this simulator does

The pressure curve follows a first-order evacuation model. A constant leak or outgassing load raises the attainable pressure floor. The economics compare current and proposed pump-down time, electrical energy and the value assigned to production or test-cycle delay.

Inputs

Example systems

Chamber and pressure

Include connected pipework and receiver volume.
Accounts for conductance and pump-speed variation.
Combined leak, permeation and approximately steady outgassing load.

Current pump

Proposed pump or upgrade

Operating economics

Hold, warm-up or cleanup time used for energy only.

Results

Both pumps can reach the targetThe target pressure is above both predicted pressure floors.
Current pump-down time
5.9 min
To the selected target
Current effective speed
70.0 m³/h
At chamber
Current pressure floor
0.0105 mbar
Ultimate pressure + gas load
Current energy per cycle
0.55 kWh
Includes additional run time
Upgrade pump-down time
3.0 min
2.9 min saved per cycle
Upgrade pressure floor
0.0103 mbar
Higher speed reduces gas-load contribution

Annual economics

Current annual operating cost
€19,849
Energy + pump-down delay value
Annual upgrade savings
€9,866
Compared with current pump
Simple payback
1.5 years
Based on annual operating savings
Evaluation-period net benefit
€34,330
After installed upgrade cost
Break-even delay value
€61.06/h
To recover upgrade cost in selected period
Annual time recovered
49.4 h
Pump-down time only
Current pump
5.9 min
Proposed pump
3.0 min

Pressure versus pump-down time

Pressure is shown on a logarithmic axis. Curves approach their calculated pressure floors asymptotically.

Current pumpProposed pumpTarget pressure

Scroll the plot horizontally for readable labels.

Vacuum chamber pressure versus pump-down timeA logarithmic pressure chart comparing current and proposed vacuum-pump evacuation curves.

How to improve pump-down performance

01
Check conductance before buying a larger pump

Shorten and enlarge the foreline, remove restrictive fittings, and verify valve and filter sizing. A large pump cannot overcome a severely restricted connection.

02
Separate leaks from outgassing

Use pressure-rise and leak-testing methods. A constant leak and a declining surface outgassing load require different corrective actions.

03
Control moisture and condensable vapours

Dry the chamber, warm the pump when appropriate, use gas ballast as specified, and allow cleanup time after vapour service.

04
Use staged pumping where needed

For medium or high vacuum, combine suitable backing and high-vacuum pumps and use manufacturer speed curves rather than one constant-speed estimate.

Interpretation, FAQ and references

Why is actual pump-down often longer?
Nominal pumping speed may fall with pressure, and piping conductance, thermal effects, desorption, leaks and vapours all add delay.

What does “pressure floor” mean?
It is the modelled steady pressure where pump removal balances pump ultimate pressure and the entered constant gas load.

Does a faster pump always save energy?
No. A larger motor may use more energy per cycle even when it saves production time. The economics separate electricity from delay value.

Can this be used for high-vacuum design?
Only as an early screening model. High-vacuum pump-down is often dominated by outgassing, conductance and pressure-dependent pump performance.