Drawing No. EH–CS–014 // Civil & Structural Engineering
Structural Engineering Formula Sheet
A mechanics-first structural reference for preliminary member behavior. These equations describe elastic stress, deformation and idealized instability; they do not replace code-specific strength, stability, serviceability, connection, seismic, fire or load-combination requirements.
Fast reference, with engineering context
Use the equations directly for screening calculations, then open the linked EngineerHub tools for input handling and unit conversion. Formula applicability and major limitations are stated beside each relation.
Reference conventions
Simply supported beam under load
01 // Axial stress, strain and elongation
For a prismatic member under concentric axial load in the linear-elastic range, stress is uniform and elongation follows Hooke’s law.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| P | Axial force | N | lbf |
| A | Cross-sectional area | m², mm² | in² |
| σ | Normal stress | Pa, MPa | psi, ksi |
| E | Young’s modulus | Pa, GPa | psi, Msi |
| L | Member length | m | in, ft |
| δ | Axial elongation | m, mm | in |
Worked example — steel tie elongation
Given: P = 120 kN, A = 2000 mm², L = 2.0 m, E = 200 GPa.
US check: ≈8.70 ksi and 0.0236 in.
Concentric loading and linear elasticity are assumed.
Eccentricity creates bending. Net-section effects, holes, yielding, fracture and connection behavior require separate checks.
02 // Common section properties
Second moment of area controls bending stiffness; section modulus connects moment directly to extreme-fiber elastic bending stress.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Second moment of area | m⁴, mm⁴ | in⁴ |
| Z | Elastic section modulus | m³, mm³ | in³ |
| J | Polar second moment (circular shaft) | m⁴, mm⁴ | in⁴ |
| b,h,d | Section dimensions | m, mm | in |
| c | Neutral-axis to extreme fiber | m, mm | in |
Worked example — 100×200 mm rectangle
Given: b = 0.100 m, h = 0.200 m.
Use the axis corresponding to the actual bending direction.
Principal-axis orientation, composite sections, transformed sections and local plate behavior can materially change stiffness and strength.
03 // Elastic bending stress
For Euler–Bernoulli beam bending in the linear-elastic range, normal stress varies linearly from the neutral axis.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| M | Bending moment | N·m, kN·m | lbf·ft, kip·ft |
| y | Distance from neutral axis | m, mm | in |
| I | Second moment of area | m⁴ | in⁴ |
| Z | Elastic section modulus | m³ | in³ |
| σ | Bending normal stress | Pa, MPa | psi, ksi |
Worked example — rectangular beam under moment
Given: M = 12 kN·m; b = 100 mm, h = 200 mm; I = 6.667×10⁻⁵ m⁴.
US check: ≈2.61 ksi.
Formula gives elastic stress, not code design strength.
Lateral-torsional buckling, local buckling, plasticity, residual stress and compactness are not represented by My/I alone.
04 // Beam transverse shear
The general elastic beam shear relation uses first moment of area Q. For a rectangle, the maximum shear stress is 1.5 times the average.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| V | Internal shear force | N | lbf |
| Q | First moment of area about neutral axis | m³ | in³ |
| I | Second moment of area | m⁴ | in⁴ |
| t | Local section thickness | m | in |
| τ | Shear stress | Pa, MPa | psi, ksi |
Worked example — rectangular section
Given: V = 40 kN; rectangular area A = 0.020 m².
US check: ≈0.435 ksi.
The maximum for a rectangle occurs at the neutral axis.
Thin-walled open/closed sections and shear flow may be better handled with q = VQ/I. Steel-code web shear strength is a separate design check.
05 // Common elastic beam deflections
Closed-form deflection equations depend on support and loading. These examples assume constant E and I and small deflection.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| P | Point load | N | lbf |
| w | Uniform line load | N/m | lbf/ft |
| L | Span | m | ft |
| E | Young’s modulus | Pa | psi |
| I | Second moment of area | m⁴ | in⁴ |
| δ | Elastic deflection | m, mm | in |
Worked example — center-loaded simple beam
Given: P = 10 kN, L = 4.0 m, E = 200 GPa, I = 6.667×10⁻⁵ m⁴.
US check: ≈0.0394 in.
Serviceability limits are project/code dependent.
Shear deformation, variable stiffness, composite action, cracking, creep and second-order effects can make these formulas inadequate.
06 // Circular-shaft torsion
For Saint-Venant torsion of a circular shaft, shear stress varies linearly with radius and twist depends on GJ.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| T | Torque | N·m | lbf·in |
| r | Radius at evaluation point | m | in |
| J | Polar second moment | m⁴ | in⁴ |
| G | Shear modulus | Pa | psi |
| L | Shaft length | m | in |
| θ | Angle of twist | rad | rad or deg |
Worked example — 50 mm solid shaft
Given: T = 500 N·m, d = 50 mm, L = 1.0 m, G = 79 GPa.
US check: τmax ≈2.95 ksi.
Noncircular torsion requires different torsion constants and stress distributions.
Keys, splines, shoulders and notches create stress concentrations and are not included in this nominal shaft solution.
07 // Euler elastic column buckling
For an ideal slender column, Euler’s critical load depends on flexural rigidity and effective length.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pcr | Euler critical load | N | lbf |
| K | Effective length factor | dimensionless | dimensionless |
| L | Unbraced/member length | m | ft |
| r | Radius of gyration | m, mm | in |
| E | Young’s modulus | Pa | psi |
| I | Buckling-axis second moment | m⁴ | in⁴ |
Worked example — pin-ended ideal column
Given: E = 200 GPa, I = 8.0×10⁻⁶ m⁴, L = 3.0 m, K = 1.0.
US check: ≈394 kip.
Euler buckling is not a general column design equation.
Real columns have yielding, residual stress, imperfections, eccentricity, local buckling and frame interaction. Use the governing design code, e.g. AISC 360-22 for structural steel.
08 // Von Mises equivalent stress
For ductile isotropic materials, von Mises stress is a useful scalar measure of multiaxial deviatoric stress for yield screening.
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | US customary |
|---|---|---|---|
| σx,σy | Normal stresses | MPa | ksi |
| τxy | In-plane shear stress | MPa | ksi |
| σvm | Von Mises equivalent stress | MPa | ksi |
Worked example — plane-stress combination
Given: σx = 100 MPa, σy = 40 MPa, τxy = 30 MPa.
US check: ≈14.72 ksi.
Von Mises is most appropriate for ductile isotropic yielding; it is not a universal failure criterion.
Brittle materials, composites, soils, concrete and anisotropic materials need failure criteria appropriate to their behavior.
09 // Quick formula summary
Compact print reference. Use the detailed sections above for definitions and limitations.
| Topic | Equation | Purpose | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axial | σ=P/A; δ=PL/AE | Axial stress/deformation | Material E |
| Section | I, Z, J | Geometry/stiffness | Beam/column |
| Bending | σ=M/Z | Elastic flexure | Beam/column |
| Shear | τ=VQ/It | Elastic transverse shear | Beam/column |
| Deflection | δ=f(P,w,L,E,I) | Serviceability | Beam/column |
| Torsion | τ=Tr/J; θ=TL/GJ | Circular shafts | Stress |
| Buckling | Pcr=π²EI/(KL)² | Ideal column instability | Beam/column |
| Von Mises | σvm | Ductile yield screening | Stress |
10 // Assumptions & limitations
Fundamental equations are only useful when their assumptions match the actual problem.
The formulas above describe mechanics, not design resistance. Load factors, resistance/safety factors, member compactness, stability, seismic provisions and connection rules are code-specific.
Most relations assume small deformation, linear elasticity and prismatic members. Cracked reinforced concrete, timber creep and nonlinear material response need specialized models.
Beam deflection and buckling are especially sensitive to restraint. Do not select K or a beam formula without matching the actual supports and load path.
11 // Technical references
AISC 360-22 is referenced for current structural-steel design context. The sheet intentionally stays with fundamental mechanics rather than reproducing code design equations without their applicability limits.